|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Radkevych, M. I. Netesa, A. M. Netesa
Pág. 59 - 68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Radkevych, T. V. Tkach, K. M. Netesa
Pág. 82 - 96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. D. Petrenko,M. I. Netesa,O. L. Tiutkin,O. V. Gromova,V. ?. Shynkarenko,V. ?. Kozachyna
Pág. 16 - 23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. D. Petrenko,M. I. Netesa,O. L. Tiutkin,O. V. Gromova,V. ?. Kozachyna
Pág. 17 - 23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. D. Petrenko,M. I. Netesa,O. L. Tiutkin,O. V. Gromova,V. A. Kozachyna
Pág. 37 - 44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Radkevych,A. M. Netesa
Pág. 171 - 181
Purpose. The paper proposes: 1) determination and formulation of factors that influence the choice of rational method for joining re-bars of vertical support members of reinforced concrete frame; 2) determination of factor parameters; 3) ranging of facto...
ver más
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Radkevych,K. M. Netesa
Pág. 205 - 212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Radkevych,A. N. Netesa
Pág. 139 - 147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. I. Netesa,D. V. Palanchuk,A. M. Netesa
Pág. 137 - 145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. V. Krasnyuk,T. V. Ulchenko,A. N. Netesa,K. N. Netesa
Pág. 161 - 164
AutoCAD 2009 possibilities of the 3D solid-body modeling are described in the article. The optimum design methods for construction drawing tasks are analyzed. The choice of methods for 3D solid-body drawing is proved by samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|