ARTÍCULO
TITULO

HERBERT HOOVER, GREAT BRITAIN, AND THE RUBBER CRISIS, 1923-1926

Silvano A. Wueschner    

Resumen

This paper examines the controversy arising out of Great Britain?s decision to implement the Stevenson plan. It examines, in particular, the role played by Herbert Hoover, both behind the scenes and in an effort to affect the repeal of the Stevenson scheme and at the same time to encourage and support the development of new sources of rubber under the control of American producers. During the period 1920-1922 rubber producing countries were confronted by the specter of overproduction. The existence of even a short term oversupply coupled with the business slump, a reaction from the war, led to a decline in the price of rubber. British producers succeeded in inducing the British Colonial authorities to support a scheme whereby rubber exports would be regulated in order to bring about an increase in the price of rubber. This plan, developed by the Stevenson Committee, called for a small minimum tax on all exports. Moreover, it soughtto limit production by establishing a quota based on the actual production of rubber during the 1919-1920 growing season. A progressive tax was applied to exports beyond standard production. American reaction to the scheme was varied. Secretary of Commerce Hoover, while publicly stating that the price of rubber had been low and was supportive of efforts to regulate production, behind the scenes showed a great deal of concern about the actions of the British government in regulating a commodity of which the United States was the single largest consumer. He was also linked, by some, to the idea that Great Britain sought to pay its war debt to the United States through the application of this tax. Much was made in American newspapers and the British press about Hoover?s criticism of British rubber restrictions. He was not opposed to regulating the supply of rubber, but only to the involvement of a government in the process, especially when it affected American producers and consumers. In response he proposed a scheme, supported by the government, to investigate the production of synthetic rubber, and the development of rubber plantations by American producers.

 Artículos similares

       
 
Tona Aurora Lubis, Asep Machpuddin, Agil Muharya     Pág. 10 - 17
The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of commodity prices of rubber and palm oil, as well  as Non Performing  Loan  (NPL) on financial  performance (return on  assets (ROA)) PT. Bank BRI Agro Tbk, either partially o... ver más

 
Jitti Kittilertpaisan,Kallaya Kittilertpaisan,Phakhaphon Khatiwat     Pág. 138 - 141
The study was conducted to analyze the technical efficiency of smallholding rubber farmers in Changwat Sakon Nakhon. The numbers of 375 smallholding rubber farmers were analyzed using stochastic frontier analysis. The smallholding rubber farmers were sam... ver más

 
M. Yusuf,Jamalludin Sulaiman     Pág. 39 - 46
The fact is that natural rubber has a strategic role as it is one of the commodities industry tropical crops. In addition, it also has important and strategic role in sup-porting the national economy, primarily as a source of livelihood of millions of ru... ver más

 
Muhammad Yusuf,Jamalludin Sulaiman     Pág. 403 - 408
Rubber is one of the top foreign exchange earners in Indonesia. Seventy percent of the land in Indonesiaused for the cultivation of rubber consists of smallholding and the remaining 30 percent are large plantations.There are 34,827 rubber smallholders in... ver más

 
Wiwit Santi Wahyuningsih     Pág. 332 - 349
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi industri unggulan yang ada di Jawa Tengah, dan kemudian industri unggulan tersebut diidentifikasi mana saja yang mempunyai daya saing ekspor. Penelitian ini menggunakan data PDRB Jawa Tengah dan PDB Tahun 2... ver más