Resumen
The study aimed to compare the effect of urea fatty fraction (UFF) and Pulrea® (urea fertilizer) on plant yield and selected plant and soil parameters determined after the plants were harvested. UFF is a by-product of essential unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) extraction from fish oil using urea, and Pulrea® is a commercial urea fertilizer. Both products were applied to the soil and the leaves (foliar application). The effect of Pulrea® on plant yield was generally stronger than that of UFF but depended on soil properties and plant species. Both fertilizers, but especially UFF, increased the total N content in the plant and effected nitrate accumulation. The plants used 45?90% of fertilizer nitrogen, with the plants generally using more N from Pulrea® than from UFF. Higher nitrogen production efficiency was achieved using Pulrea® than UFF and when plants were cultivated on medium soil than on light soil. Fertilizers increased the acidity and electrolytic conductivity of both soils but did not induce soil salinization. They increased the content of mineral nitrogen forms in soils, which was generally the case more in soil with Pulrea® application than with UFF application. As a rule, the soil dehydrogenases activity did not change significantly or even decrease after fertilizer application. It was visibly higher in medium soil and after foliar Pulrea® application than after foliar UFF application. This may be due to the content of accompanying substances in UFF that affect nitrogen absorption from this fertilizer. Based on the results, it cannot be clearly stated that one of the tested fertilizers had a better effect on the studied parameters. Generally, the less favorable effects of UFF compared to Pulrea® may indicate the necessity of removing from UFF the accompanying substances that may adversely affect plants and soil microorganisms. This aspect needs to be investigated under controlled conditions in field experiments.