ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Comparison of Offline, Real-Time Models and Hardware-in-the-Loop Test Results of a Power Take-Off for Wave Energy Applications

Luca Castellini    
Federico Gallorini    
Giacomo Alessandri    
Erick Fernando Alves    
Dan Montoya    
Bhavana Mudigonda and Elisabetta Tedeschi    

Resumen

The power take-off (PTO) of a wave energy converter (WEC) converts mechanical power extracted from the waves into electrical power. Increasing PTO performance under several operational conditions is therefore essential to reduce the levelized cost of energy of a given wave energy concept and to achieve higher levels of technology readiness. A key task in the WEC design will then be the holistic assessment of the PTO performance in combination with other subsystems. It is hence important that WEC designers are aware of the different modeling options. This paper addresses this need and presents two alternative wave-to-wire modeling approaches based on a 250 kW modular electromechanical PTO coupled to an oscillating wave surge converter (OWSC) device. The first is a detailed and accurate offline model. The second model is a simplified and faster version of the first, being adequate for rapid analyses and real-time (RT) simulation. The paper presents the benchmarking of the offline model against the RT model and the hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) tests of the PTO. The normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) is considered as a quantitative indicator for the measurement of real-time and HIL test results against the offline simulation. Results show that the dynamics of the offline model are well represented by the RT model with execution times up to 10 times faster. The offline model also depicts well the behavior observed in the HIL tests with the NRMSE values for the PTO position, velocity, and force above 0.90, which shows the HIL test results replicates with fidelity the dynamic behavior of the complete model. Meaningful differences are however present and highlighted in this paper. An understanding of the advantages and drawbacks of these three approaches is fundamental to properly design a WEC during its project cycle and validate PTO concepts with a certain level of simplification.

 Artículos similares

       
 
L. Thanga Mariappan, J. Arun Pandian, V. Dhilip Kumar, Oana Geman, Iuliana Chiuchisan and Carmen Nastase    
Cryptocurrency has emerged as a well-known significant component with both economic and financial potential in recent years. Unfortunately, Bitcoin acquisition is not simple, due to uneven business and significant rate fluctuations. Traditional approache... ver más
Revista: Applied Sciences

 
Xin Shi, Pengfei Chen and Linying Chen    
Due to the influence of the natural environment, it is very challenging to control the movement of ships to navigate safely and avoid potential risks induced by external environmental factors, especially for the development of autonomous ships in inland ... ver más

 
Fethi Candan, Omer Faruk Dik, Tufan Kumbasar, Mahdi Mahfouf and Lyudmila Mihaylova    
This study presents the design and real-time applications of an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy PID (IT2-FPID) control system on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a flexible cable-connected payload in comparison to the PID and Type-1 Fuzzy PID (T1-FPID) counte... ver más
Revista: Algorithms

 
Long Chen, Diju Gao and Qimeng Xue    
Reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions from ships is a major concern. The development of hybrid technologies offers a new direction for the rational distribution of energy. Therefore, this paper establishes a torque model for internal combustio... ver más

 
Lorenz Dingeldein    
While the growth of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usage over the next few years is indisputable, cooperative operation strategies for UAV swarms have gained great interest in the research community. Mission capabilities increase while contingencies can b... ver más
Revista: Aerospace