Resumen
With the rapid development of the subway rail transit, tunnels are buried at an increasing depth, raising the requirements of bearing capacity and waterproofness for linings. Functionally graded materials are introduced into the design of linings to save costs, and concrete with different elastic moduli is equipped at different positions to reduce the waste of materials, compared to the homogeneous lining. The significance of this study includes that the functionally graded lining for the buried subway tunnel is under the non-uniform confining pressure and the calculation model of internal force and deformation for the functionally graded lining is established. The elastic modulus of the lining is set to vary with the angle in the form of a power function, and the function parameters are analyzed on the basis of this model. The results show that the radial displacement of the lining axis decreases with the increase in a and b, but the deformation mode remains the same, and the reduction in deformation is smaller and smaller. With the increase in a and b, the distribution trend of the moment remains the same. The lateral pressure coefficient ??
?
has a great impact on the safety of the structure, which exceeds the influence of the function parameters on the safety of the structure. The displacement of the lining axis and the section moment change linearly with the increase in ??
?
. With the increase in ??
?
, the shape of the lining changes significantly, which shows that the side with larger pressure deforms to the inside and the side with smaller pressure expands to the outside. When the maximum deformation occurs at 0°
0
°
, the parameter a should be larger than b. When the maximum deformation occurs at 90°
90
°
, the parameter b should be larger than a, so as to minimize the cost of materials and reduce the structural deformation. Finally, the numerical simulation is conducted to verify the theoretical results, showing that the calculation model of internal force and deformation is suitable for the cylinder with ??/??=0.2
t
/
R
=
0.2
, and there is a certain gap between the theoretical calculation and numerical simulation, but the largest gap of the displacement is within 8%. Compared with Function I, Function II has some advantages in reducing the maximum deformation of the structure, but the advantages are relatively low. The analysis results have significant reference value for designers and relevant scholars.