Redirigiendo al acceso original de articulo en 22 segundos...
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

The prequalified competition - how are architects appointed to invited architectural competitions?

Magnus Rönn    

Resumen

This article presents results from a study of prequalification in architectural competitions. The aim is to develop knowledge of how the organizer appoints candidates to invited competitions. Prequalification is a selection procedure used early in the competition process to identifysuitable candidates for the following design phase. Usually three to six teams are invited to develop design proposals. The overall research question in the study is about how organizers identify architects / design teams for competitions with limited participation. The methodology includes an inventory of competitions, case studies, document review and interviews of key-persons. Ten municipal and governmental competitions have been examined in the study. There are 375 applications from design teams in the competitions. 43 architect firms/teams (11 %) have been invited. In five of the ten competitions 19 informants have reported their experiences of prequalification. The informants responded to an interview guide with questions on the background of the competition, development of the invitation, and the need for information about the candidates, assessment process and experience from the selection of architects / design teams. The invitation emerges during negotiation at the organizing body, which includes discussion with the Swedish Association of Architects.General conditions, submission requirements and criteria for the evaluation of applications by architect firms are part of an established practice. All clients have an assessment procedure made up of two distinct stages. First they check whether applications meet the specific ?must requirements? in the invitation. Thereafter follows an evaluative assessment of the candidate?s professional profile, which is based on the criteria in the invitation. Reference projects and information from the referees are important sources of information in this stage. Decisivein the final assessment is the organizer?s perception of the candidates? ability to produce projects of architectural quality, the ability to combine creative solutions with functional requirements and aptitude to work with developers and contractors.

 Artículos similares

       
 
Eva Hurtado Torán     Pág. 83 - 86
El legado Mariano García Benito (en adelante MGB), formalizado en 2022 al Servicio Histórico del COAM, permite estudiar la obra de un arquitecto conocido por algunos edificios icónicos, pero no por el conjunto de su trabajo. Estudiante y profesional bril... ver más

 
Almudena Ribot     Pág. 100 - 103
Este texto abarca la búsqueda de estrategias proyectuales eficaces para ampliar la 'capacidad de acción' de los espacios que proyectamos los arquitectos. Investiga cómo proyectar arquitectura para facilitar la capacidad performativa de los habitantes y u... ver más

 
Luz Carruthers     Pág. 105 - 108
The purpose of this research is to study the intersection between 21st century architecture and infrastructure, understood as a physical fact as well as an abstract concept, through the notion of Infrastructure Space. Since the 1960s, the definition of i... ver más

 
Eduardo de Santiago Rodríguez,Isabel González García     Pág. 1 - 102
ResumenEn este artículo se presenta el planeamiento urbanístico del área urbana de León como ejemplo paradigmático del enfoque neodesarrollista que fue característico del pasado boom inmobiliario español, combinando liberalización del suelo y apuesta por... ver más

 
Luz Carruthers     Pág. 68 - 77
Esta investigación propone estudiar la intersección entre la arquitectura del s. XXI y la infraestructura, entendida como hecho físico y concepto abstracto, a través de la noción de espacio infraestructura. Desde la década del 60?, la definición de infra... ver más