Resumen
This study investigates one notable result that the REDD+ (?Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stocks and conservation?) initiative effected within Indonesia?s forest institutions. It argues that during its interplay with existing National forest institutions REDD+ produced a significant benefit; namely, the ?one map initiative? (OMI) being the government?s response to the call for greater transparency and enabling of REDD+ implementation. It asks: ?Does the ?One Map Initiative? signify a switch to a new path of map-making, or is it just another innovation within an existing path dependence of forest governance?? Through eighty semi-structured interviews with ?REDD+ policy actors? and the deployment of ?path dependence? theory, this study seeks to determine the extent to which the REDD+ initiative created a ?critical juncture? (i.e., momentum for institutions to move to a new path). This study maps the institutional path dependence within forest-mapping as a means for the state to gain control of forest resources. In its development process the OMI has shown its ability to break the old path-dependence of map-making (e.g., lack of transparency, low level of public participation, and poor coordination amongst ministries). Moreover, this paper identified several historical events (i.e., ?critical junctures?) that preceded the REDD+ initiative as contributing factors to the relative success of REDD+ in effecting forest governance reform.