Redirigiendo al acceso original de articulo en 16 segundos...
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

The Contribution of Ramp Demand in the Capacity of Merge Bottleneck Locations

Alexandra Kondyli    
Phani Gubbala    
Lily Elefteriadou    

Resumen

Transportation engineers rely on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) for estimating capacity at freeway segments. According to the HCM 2010, the capacity of the basic freeway segments is a function of the free-flow speed and it ranges from 2,400 passenger cars per hour per lane (pc/h/ln) for FFS 70 or 75 mi/h, to 2,250 pc/h/ln for FFS 55 mi/h. The freeway merge segments methodology in the HCM 2010 Update uses these same capacity values in the analysis procedure, although research has shown that capacities at these bottleneck locations are considerably lower. In addition to that, researchers have also observed that capacity varies significantly from day to day and from one site to the other. Researchers acknowledge that driver behavior and frequent interactions between mainline and ramp vehicles at these junctions are the causal factor of these variations in capacity and the low capacity values; however, this has not been reflected in the updated version of the HCM 2010. Furthermore, the HCM 2010 Update does not account for the conflicting movements and the contribution of the ramp vehicles on the overall merge junction capacity. This paper investigates the relationship between freeway and ramp demand and capacity at merge junctions. For the purposes of this research, historic data at merge bottleneck locations across North America with different geometric and operational characteristics were analyzed. The results of the analysis show that, there is a clear correlation between ramp demand, freeway demand and freeway capacity. More specifically, higher demand on the on-ramps produces lower overall capacity values. In addition, this paper proposes new capacity values for merge junctions as a function of the freeway and ramp demand and number of lanes.

 Artículos similares

       
 
Justin Geistefeldt     Pág. 417 - 425
The second edition of the German Highway Capacity Manual HBS was published in 2015. The paper presents the HBS procedure for the assessment of basic freeway segments and discusses challenges for the future development of the methodology. As in the former... ver más

 
Roland Trapp     Pág. 594 - 606
A local non-restrictive ramp metering strategy PRO is introduced. It is based on the stochasticity of capacity. The ramp metering algorithm shows innovative features: upstream time shifted measurements for anticipation, measurements are actuated every se... ver más

 
Nina von der Heiden, Justin Geistefeldt     Pág. 233 - 244
Work zones considerably influence the traffic flow quality on freeways. In work zones, the capacity can be significantly reduced due to narrower lanes, a reduced number of traffic lanes, and unfavorable roadway geometry. In order to evaluate the impact o... ver más

 
Martin Hartmann, Peter Vortisch     Pág. 426 - 437
Unlike the U.S. 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, the most recent edition of German Highway Capacity Manual does not include methodology to evaluate the facility within oversaturated time periods. To incorporate this traffic flow regime within the methodolog... ver más

 
Helen Waleczek, Justin Geistefeldt, Dijana Cindric-Middendorf, Gerd Riegelhuth     Pág. 257 - 266
Work zones on freeways usually affect the quality of service for road users. Aiming to reduce traffic flow disruptions to a minimum, Hessen Mobil ? Road and Traffic Management installed an innovative reversible lane system in a work zone on Autobahn A 3 ... ver más