Redirigiendo al acceso original de articulo en 17 segundos...
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Higher Education Institutions Grading: Administrative and Support Personnel

Andrey Vladimirovich Kirillov    
Mikhail Vasilevich Vinichenko    
Alexander Vasilevich Melnichuk    
Yulyia Alexandrovna Melnichuk    
Yulyia Lakina    

Resumen

This article describes main grading principles applied in Russia as well as internationally. The grading system is based on those used by Hay Group and Watson Wyatt. We evaluated existing grading examples for administrative and support personnel, methodology, effectiveness and how it affects performance results in Higher Education Institutions. Based on this, we set goals, principles and established regulatory basis for implementing grading in the University. In addition to this, we studied all possible ways to create effective working group to carry out this task and, its activities and performance in proceeding with administrative and support personnel optimization and organizational reform at large aiming to create a sustainable effective structure in the University. The effectiveness indicators (KPI), their use as well as the positions? scale, compensation packages and re-designed remuneration system were introduced. Nevertheless, during this process we identified a number of problems that University leadership faced while implementing reform. These problems occurred largely due to personnel non-readiness for cordial changes, lengthy decision making and complex management system (at the level of the Ministry of Higher Education and other related regulatory bodies) that constantly changes during reform system and counter reforms danger. We would like to point out that grading was carried out by University personnel without third party involvement that lead to effective management team formation.Keywords: grading, Hay Group and Watson Wyatt technology, effectiveness indicators, optimization, positions importance, positions assessment, ranking factors, compensation system, remuneration structure, organizational and staff structure.JEL Classifications: I21; I28

 Artículos similares

       
 
Belicia Viola,Josephine Aryanto,Nany Chandra Marsetio,Retno Yuliati     Pág. 255 - 272
This study examines how board characteristics (gender, education, and age) and board size can impact corporate risk disclosure (CRD) in quantity and coverage. This research differs from previous studies because we use the newest COSO framework (2017) to ... ver más

 
Nadira S. Sidik,Niswatin Niswatin,Nilawaty Yusuf     Pág. 219 - 236
The role of budgetary participation in improving managerial performance occurs in the Higher Education environment. If not given the opportunity to determine the contents of the budget, it will cause dysfunctional behavior. The purpose of this study was ... ver más

 
Bogdan Nichifor,Laura ?imira?,Lumini?a Zai?    
The impact of higher education is reflected in both individual and collective benefits, economic and non-economic. For example, if pursuing higher education means an increased chance of employment at the individual level and of being better paid, at the ... ver más

 
Chien-Liang Chen and Lin-Chuan Chen    
This research investigates the impact of higher education expansion on the educational wage premium from a long-term perspective in Taiwan. By using 1985 to 2015 Manpower Utilization Survey (MUS) data with the difference-in-difference-in-differences mode... ver más

 
Hafiz T.A. Khan     Pág. 6 - 10
The study attempts to evaluate the role of Bangabandu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the Founding Father of Bangladesh, in his initial plan on higher education and to produce adequate human resources to rebuild the country since independence. Secondary sources o... ver más