Resumen
This research compared the performance of a cylindrical mesoscale combustor against two planar mesoscale combustors, which include the shape of the flame front, temperature of the combustor axis and the combustor wall, and the resulting flammability limit. The combustor used has a circular, square and rectangular cross-section. All three combustors have the same cross-section area and combustion chamber volume. The flame holder used is a double narrow slit. The fuel used is liquefied petroleum gas with a pure oxygen oxidizer. The experiment results showed that the cylindrical combustor produces a more even flame shape that fills the combustion chamber and there is no clear separation between the sides of the flame on each side of the narrow slit. A high ratio of the entrance to average velocity results in a large adverse pressure gradient which generates vortex and recirculation behind the flame holder which gives the mixture a longer chance in the combustion chamber (prolonged residence time). The flame front shape affects the temperature of the combustor axis. The flame front shape that fills the entire combustion chamber has a higher flame temperature than the separate flame front shape. The circular combustor has the highest average axis temperature, but it has the lowest combustor wall temperature. This fact shows that the circular combustor has the smallest heat loss from the flame to the combustor wall. Furthermore, a circular mesoscale combustor has the most extensive stability map. For the same volume, the circular combustor has a lower surface area to volume ratio, thus the heat loss is also low. The dead zone area also becomes narrower, only at a low reactant rate. Rectangular combustors have the largest surface area to volume ratio, thus the losses are also the biggest. Despite the narrowest flammability limits, rectangular combustors have the highest average wall temperatures