Redirigiendo al acceso original de articulo en 20 segundos...
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Millennial Workforce: Communicating And Multitasking

Sherry Robinson    
Hans Anton Stubberud    

Resumen

The habits and behaviors of the Millennials are of some concern to employers across the Western world (Alsop, Nicholson & Miller, 2009; McGuire, By & Hutchings, 2007; Myers & Sadaghiani, 2010; Smola & Sutton, 2002). This group of people born between approximately 1979 and 1994 has grown up with communication technology and has never known a time when these conveniences were not available. People of this generation are generally thought to have different styles of and expectations for communication, both of which could have an influence on teams and organization performance (Gorman, Nelson & Glassman, 2004; Greenbaum & Query, 1999; Howe & Strauss, 2000; Tapscott, 1998; Zemke, Raines & Filipczak, 2000). Organizations may find that they need to adapt their policies and procedures in order to take advantage of the special skills offered by Millennials and minimize problems within the organization (Gursoy, Maier & Chi, 2008). For those Millennials pursuing higher education at the university level, going to school could be considered their primary job, with paid employment on the side. How this generation behaves in classes can be an indication of how they expect to act in their careers. Just as they use computers and smartphones to access the internet and send sms text messages and email throughout the day, (even during their college classes), they also expect to stay connected during the course of their working day, including the time spent in meetings with subordinates, peers, managers and those outside the organization. Indeed, staying connected is a central part of their lives (Frand, 2000) and they expect that others, including managers, will also use these forms of communication to stay in constant contact with them (Hagner, 2001; Robinson & Stubberud, 2012a, 2012b). Business students are among the most eager to use technology in the classroom, and assumedly, at work (Kvavik, 2011). To gain a better understanding of the communication behaviors of the workforce that is joining the working world, this study examines the behaviors reported by both American and Norwegian university students. Comparing the responses of students in two countries allows shows which behaviors are typical in both countries. This is important not only for managers who deal with international employees, but also for those who need to know about employees in their own countries.

 Artículos similares

       
 
Fhrizz S. De Jesus, Hazel Jade E. Villamar, Ramezesh E. Dionisio     Pág. 40 - 53
AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic has expedited the transition towards a more technologically advanced world, with lasting repercussions on online buying habits. Due to constraints on face-to-face communication, the consumer has migrated from in-person to on... ver más

 
Daiki Ogawa and Rui Fukumoto    
The growing shortage of human resources for managing landscape in the water environment has led to problems concerning the preservation of the landscape in Japan. For developing people have the awareness to preserve the landscape, it is important to unde... ver más
Revista: Water

 
CUYA Thamar M.,DAYRIT Amayna Shaene C.,CUYA-ANTONIO Olive Chester,PASCUAL Marilou P.,FRONDA Jennifer G.     Pág. 113 - 120
Graduate education plays a significant role in the development and the economy of the nation. Therefore, it is significant to evaluate the program it offers as they provide relevant contributions to their graduates? knowledge, skills, and ability in the ... ver más

 
Ladifatou GACHILI NDI GBAMBIE,Ousseni MONGBET     Pág. 1 - 22
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries have benefited for more than fifty years from international aid in the form of loans and/or donations. Nevertheless, they seem not to benefit from these massive financial resources (ODA) they receive because their econo... ver más

 
Julio Garrote, Ignacio Gutiérrez-Pérez and Andrés Díez-Herrero    
Calibration and validation of flood risk maps at a national or a supra-national level remains a problematic aspect due to the limited information available to carry out these tasks. However, this validation is essential to define the representativeness o... ver más
Revista: Water