Redirigiendo al acceso original de articulo en 18 segundos...
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Why It Matters For Collegial Leaders To Have A Binocular Vision

Prakash Singh    

Resumen

The question that is addressed in this article is whether it matters for collegial leaders to have a binocular vision. Imagine looking through a pair of binoculars as a metaphor for leadership. One lens of the binoculars represents cognitive abilities (IQ) and technical skills while the other represents emotional intelligence (EI). Monocular vision, using only IQ produces a very narrow view of the horizon. Binocular vision, combining IQ with EI, produces much clearer, broader and far reaching views. Exemplary collegial leaders use both lenses to inspire the best from their people and sustain high performance from individuals, teams and organizations. EI is not in opposition to IQ but it is an extension of the humans potential to succeed in a people-orientated environment. Traditional cognitive intelligence (IQ) is combined with non-cognitive intelligence (EI) to help leaders perform at their best and inspire their followers to be successful and happy. This exploratory research suggests that the complexities of organizations require a new focus on collegial leadership that extends beyond possessing cognitive abilities alone. The findings strongly suggest that a significant relationship exists between the development of a collegial environment that is identified by collaborative teamwork, shared decision-making, shared core values, a shared vision, shared leadership opportunities and meaningful empowerment, and a collegial leaders EI. The respondents support for a leadership style that offers them the opportunity to be actively involved in creative decision-making strategies rather than be subjected to an autocratic style of control was clearly indicated in their responses.

 Artículos similares

       
 
John M. Polimeni, Kittaya Vichansavakul, Raluca I. Iorgulescu, Ray Chandrasekara    
Health outcomes research typically uses cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analysis. These approaches take a narrow perspective of the individual effects, typically from the payer or the provider point-of-view. However, using these narrow perspectives mi... ver más

 
Anne Marie Knott, Hart E. Posen, and Brian Wu     Pág. 373 - 388