Resumen
The term ?megaclast? started circulation near the beginning of the 21st century. The present review is aimed at examination of the use of this term in the modern geoscience literature. The main method is bibliographical survey of the articles published during 2000?2017 with the on-line bibliographical database ?Scopus?. The main findings are as follows. The term ?megaclast? has not been used extensively, but the number of the articles employing this term increased in the mid-2000s and in the early 2010s. The majority of the papers deal with megaclasts of Quaternary age. The megaclast research focuses on five regions, namely West Europe, Australia and New Zealand, Western North America, Southern South America, and the Pacific and circum-Pacific. The most studied are megaclasts occurring on coasts influenced by tsunamis and storms; significant attention has been paid also to those clasts transported by volcanism-triggered debris flows and slope failures, both continental and submarine. There are three serious biases relevant to the use of the term ?megaclast? in the geoscience literature, namely stratigraphical, geographical, and genetic biases. Due to this incompleteness in the knowledge of megaclasts, this term should be either used more actively, which is preferable, or abandoned.