Redirigiendo al acceso original de articulo en 17 segundos...
ARTÍCULO
TITULO

Comparison between the RANS Simulations of Double-Body Flow and Water?Air Flow around a Ship in Static Drift and Circle Motions

Long Jiang    
Jianxi Yao and Zuyuan Liu    

Resumen

Manoeuvrability is one of the important ship hydrodynamic performances. That is closely related to the safety and economy of navigation. The development of a high-accuracy and high-efficiency numerical method to compute the forces and moments on manoeuvring ships has been the main task for ship manoeuvring predictions. The numerical method by solving RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier?Stokes) equations may be the most used one nowadays for the computations of ship manoeuvring forces and moments. However, applying a RANS tool for ship manoeuvring prediction remains very low efficiency, especially considering the six-degrees-of-freedom ship motions on the water surface. Thus, it is very necessary to introduce a few assumptions to reduce the computational time when applying a RANS tool, e.g., the assumptions of double-body flow and body force propeller, and consequently improve the application efficiency. Generally speaking, the assumption of double-body flow, in which the free-surface effects are neglected, is more suitable for low-speed ships. Nevertheless, rare publications have been reported relating to how this assumption affects the accuracy of the computed manoeuvring forces and moments. To this end, this article presents a comparative study between the RANS simulations of double-body flow and water?air flow around a container ship performing static drift and static circle motions. Three ship speeds, corresponding to the Froude numbers 0.156, 0.201, and 0.260, respectively, are considered during the simulations. The computed side forces and yaw moments obtained by the water?air flow simulations are closer to the available experimental data than that obtained by the double-body flow simulations for all ship speeds. The computed surge forces obtained by water?air flow simulations also agree well with the experimental data, whereas the computed surge forces obtained by the double-body flow simulations are wrong. The reasons are analyzed by comparing the pressure distributions on the ship surface and the flow separations around the ship.