Resumen
Landscape metrics constitute one of the main tools for the study of the changes of the landscape and of the ecological structure of a region. The most popular software for landscape metrics evaluation is FRAGSTATS, which is free to use but does not have free or open source software (FOSS). Therefore, FOSS implementations, such as QGIS?s LecoS plugin and GRASS? r.li modules suite, were developed. While metrics are defined in the same way, the ?cell neighborhood? parameter, specifying the configuration of the moving window used for the analysis, is managed differently: FRAGSTATS can use values of 4 or 8 (8 is default), LecoS uses 8 and r.li 4. Tests were performed to evaluate the landscape metrics variability depending on the ?cell neighborhood? values: some metrics, such as ?edge density? and ?landscape shape index?, do not change, other, for example ?patch number?, ?patch density?, and ?mean patch area?, vary up to 100% for real maps and 500% for maps built to highlight this variation. A review of the scientific literature was carried out to check how often the value of the ?cell neighborhood? parameter is explicitly declared. A method based on the ?aggregation index? is proposed to estimate the effect of the uncertainty on the ?cell neighborhood? parameter on landscape metrics for different maps.